Consistency In The Regulation Of Aggravating Circumstances For Parents Under Child Protection Law Following The Enactment Of The National Criminal Code (Focusing on the Incompleteness of Provisions on Aggravated Penalties for the Crime of Child Traffickin
Abstract
Changes to national criminal law through the enactment of the National Criminal Code and Law No. 1 of 2026 on Criminal Adjustments have created a need to examine the continuity and consistency of provisions regarding aggravated penalties for parents who commit criminal acts against their children. This issue is particularly significant in the context of child trafficking offenses because the Child Protection Act provides for aggravated penalties against parents, guardians, or caregivers under certain circumstances; however, Article 83 does not explicitly stipulate specific aggravated penalties based on the perpetrator’s status as a biological parent. This study aims to analyze the changes and continuity in the provisions regarding aggravated penalties for parents following the enactment of the National Criminal Code (KUHP) and to assess their consistency in the crime of child trafficking compared to certain other crimes against children. The study employs a normative legal method using legislative, conceptual, and historical approaches. Legal materials were analyzed qualitatively through interpretation and comparison of provisions. The results indicate that the status of parents has been recognized as a relevant factor for imposing aggravated penalties in certain crimes against children; however, the formulation and scope of these provisions are not yet fully consistent. In the crime of child trafficking, the relationship between the general provisions on aggravating factors and the corresponding criminal provisions still requires careful legal interpretation. Therefore, a clearer and more systematic regulatory framework is needed while ensuring the principles of legality and legal certainty.
References
Dr. Johnny Ibrahim, S.H., M.Hum. Teori & Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayu Media, 2013.
Effendi, Jonaedi. Cepat Dan Mudah Memahami Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Fajar Interpratama Mandiri, 2014.
Mahrus Ali, S.H., M.H. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
Prof. Dr. Edi Ribut Harwanto, S.H., M.H., C.CLAd., C.LC., C.CM., C.MT. Pembaruan Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Keadilan Substantif Dalam KUHP Dan KUHAP Baru. Purwokerto: Pustaka Devata, 2026.
Soerjono Soekanto, Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja bGrafindo Persada, 1986.
Tanamas, Muhammad Joni Zulchaina Z. Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Anak Dalam Perspektif Konvensi Hak Anak. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2017.
Journal
Abdul Madjid, Apriyanto Nusa, I Nyoman Nurjaya, and Bambang Sugiri. “The Meaning of Waiver of Case for Public Interest (Seponeering) in the Criminal Justice System.” International Journal of Social Science Research and Review 5, no. 1 (2023): 159–65.
Adelia Arya Wahaning, Erny Herlin Setyorini. “Pertanggung Jawaban Pidana Orang Tua Yang Memperdagangkan Anak Kandungnya Sendiri.” Journal Evidence Of Law 2, no. 2 (2023): 10. https://jurnal.erapublikasi.id/JEL/article/view/399/476.
Aidika, Shinta, Sherlyta Wahyu Sugiarti, Zacky Chandra Ekny, Asa Barno, and Happy Ramadhany. “Proceeding of Conference on Law and Perbedaan Paradigma Di Dalam KUHP Lama Dan KUHP 2023,” 2023.
Alendra, Said Rizal, Roswita Sitompul, Tommy Leonard, and Nurul Hidayat Ab Rahman. Reformulating Criminal Law Policy on Child Perpetrators of Human Trafficking in Indonesia: A Child Victim-Offender Approach. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies. Vol. 11, 2026. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v11i1.42124.
Ang, Felix, and Evi Retno Wulan. “Prinsip Keadilan Dalam Penjatuhan Sanksi Alasan Pemberat Pidana Dalam Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual: Studi Kasus Nomor 724/Pid.B/2023/Pn Sda.” PESHUM : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Humaniora 4, no. 3 (2025): 3789–95. https://doi.org/10.56799/peshum.v4i3.8051.
Anisa, Devi Nur, Maya Sari Novita, and Abdul Rahman M S. “Transformasi Pengaturan Aturan Peralihan Dari KUHP Lama Ke KUHP Nasional Sebagai Implementasi Pembaruan Hukum Pidana,” 2026, 13056–63.
Arya Jalu Pananjung, Devi Dameriza, Sari Tiara, Rahmi Akhmal, Aidil Fernando. “Perubahan Pidana Dari KUHP Lama Ke Baru Sebagai Reformasi Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia Mengalami Transformasi Fundamental Dengan Disahkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana ( KUHP ) P.” Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora 5 (2026): 603–19.
Carolin, A, and B Harefa. “Urgensi Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Anak Di Indonesia Melalui Upaya Hukum Penal Dan Non Penal.” JUSTITIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan … 8, no. 4 (2021): 525–39. http://jurnal.um-tapsel.ac.id/index.php/Justitia/article/view/2611.
Daffa Renaldy, Aristo Fadhil Khalik, Hafidza Rafi Andhika, Zainab Ompu Jainah. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Korban Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang Di Indonesia” 10, no. 1 (2023): 6–24.
Huda, Chairul. “Pola Pemberatan Pidana Dalam Hukum Pidana Khusus.” JURNAL HUKUM 4, no. 1 (2022): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.37729/amnesti.v4i1.1399%0Ahttp://ridum.umanizales.edu.co:8080/jspui/bitstream/6789/377/4/Muoz_Zapata_Adriana_Patricia_Artculo_2011.pdf.
Ika, Darmika. “Renewing of Child Criminal Justie Systems in Indonesia Pembaharuan Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum De’rechtsstaat 5, no. 2 (2019): 85–86.
Indayani, Juwita, Johari Johari, and Fatahillah Fatahillah. “Pemidanaan Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Pemberatan Dalam Perspektif Kriminologi.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Malikussaleh 8, no. 3 (2025). https://doi.org/10.29103/jimfh.v8i3.22736.
Izzah, Amnah Nur, John Supriyanto, Sulaiman M. Nur, Hadiana Trendi Azami, Achmad Yafik Mursyid, Muhammad Bagus Febriyanto, Karakteristik Manuskrip, et al. “Dilema Pemberatan Pidana Pada Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam KUHP Nasional 2023.” Zitteliana 7, no. 1 (2023): 159–70. http://jurnal.staialanwar.ac.id/index.php/itqon/article/view/52%0Ahttp://jurnal.staialanwar.ac.id/index.php/itqon/article/download/52/89.
Jodi, Faris Fachrizal. “Obstruction of Justice Dalam Upaya Penegak Hukum.” Jurnal Litigasi 25, no. 1 (2024): 110–23.
Natalia, Christanti, and Diding Rahmat. “Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Keterlibatan Ibu Kandung Dalam Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Orang (Studi Putusan Nomor 1451/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Mdn)” 2, no. 14 (2025): 60–76.
Pradistha, Kadek Nandha, Made Sugi Hartono, and I Wayan Landrawan. “DISPARITAS PEMIDANAAN DALAM KASUS PERSETUBUHAN TERHADAP ANAK (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 140/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Sgr Dan Putusan Nomor 10/Pid.Sus/2023/PN.Sgr,)” 4 (2024): 1–12.
Prija Djatmika, M. Nur Syafiuddin, Rachmad, Safa’at, and Istislam. “Understanding Child Support in the Pattern of Child Protection Based on the Principle of Child Protection.” International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 8, no. 1 (2021): 92. https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i1.2260.
Prof. Dr. Edi Ribut Harwanto, S.H., M.H., C.CLAd., C.LC., C.CM., C.MT. Pembaruan Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Keadilan Substantif Dalam KUHP Dan KUHAP Baru. Purwokerto: Pustaka Devata, 2026.
Puspa Dewi, Monika Dita, and Muhammad Iqbal Baiquni. “Tanggung Jawab Orang Tua Terhadap Anak Sebagai Korban Child Trafficking Di Indonesia.” JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law 2, no. 1 (2021): 81–105. https://doi.org/10.18326/jil.v2i1.81-105.
Ramdani, Ramdani. “Hak Anak Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak Di Indonesia.” Negara Dan Keadilan 9, no. 1 (2020): 91. https://doi.org/10.33474/hukum.v9i1.7626.
Rifandy Ritonga, Agnestika. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Perdagangan Anak Di Bawah Umur Di Provinsi Lampung (Studi Putusan Nomor: 692/PID.SUS/2024/PN.TJK).” HELIUM - Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities 2, no. 1 (2025): 771–96.
Rizkyansyah, Septian, and Adianto Mardijono. “Pemberatan Pidana Terhadap Orang Tua Yang Menjadi Pelaku Human Trafficking Ini Termaktub Dalam Kalimat : "... Oleh Karena Itu Dibentuklah Pemerintahan Negara Indonesia , Serta Memajukan Kesejahteraan Umum , Pendidikan Dalam Kehidupan Metode Penelitian Bak” 3, no. 2 (2025): 132–38.
Seftiniara, Intan Nurina. “Analisis Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penipuan Perempuan Yang Dijadikan Pekerja Seks Komersial.” Pranata JHukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 2 (2015): 17–17.
Triwati, Ani, and Doddy Kridasaksana. “Pijakan Perlunya Diversi Anak Dalam Pengulangan Tindak Pidana.” USM Law Review 4, no. 2 (2021): 828–43. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/482747703.pdf.
Yolanda Fitria Salma, Ahmad Irzal Fardiansyah, Dona Raisa Monica, Tri Andrisman, and Nikmah Rosidah. “Analisis Pemidanaan Pada Anak Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Dalam Perspektif KUHP Nasional 2023.” Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Hukum 2, no. 4 (2025): 213–22. https://doi.org/10.62383/terang.v2i4.1475.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 Tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, Pub. L. No. 1 (2023).
Undang-undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2026 Tentang Penyesuaian Pidana (2026).
Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 Tentang Perlindungan Anak, Pub. L. No. 23 (2002).

PT. Brilliant Eduriset Global
Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Pasuruan, Indonesia
ARJUNU




