IMPLEMENTING FRAMEWORK OF CEFR FOR TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE IN NON-ENGLISH STUDY PROGRAM

  • Hafizah Rifiyanti Institut Bisnis dan Informatika Kosgoro 1957

Abstract

The assumption that English lessons are difficult makes some students feel reluctant to improve their English skills. This learning difficulty has an impact on the decline in academic achievement of students who are running this education. For this reason, the author felt the need to conduct a study on how effective the CEFR with an action-oriented approach is used in teaching English. This research was conducted by determining the students' actual level of English proficiency, setting achievable learning goals, and assisting students in more purposeful learning. The CEFR is a frame of reference used to measure a person's language ability, including English. This study is quantitative research. To measure the effectiveness of the study, pre and post-test assessments were used. The value of the pre and post-test assessment is the research data. The instrument used to collect data was the assessment of the English for Communication course. The respondents of this study were 63 students of Informatics Engineering and Information Systems 1st semester, Institut Bisnis dan Informatika  1957. The average score of students before and after the provision of CEFR material is different or there is an effect of increasing student scores from 55 to 72. It is very important to adjust the CEFR to the context and needs of students because the CEFR is a framework and not a curriculum. The findings of this study imply the following, namely recognizing the proficiency level of the learners: This study can reveal the proficiency level of English learners which can help align the curriculum with the CEFR levels. Determining areas of strength and weakness. Furthermore, this information can help design courses and select materials and activities that suit the needs of students and their proficiency levels. Lecturers can create instruments for assessment and evaluation using the CEFR framework.

References

Athanasiou, A., Constantinou, E. K., Neophytou, M., Nicolaou, A., Papadima Sophocleous, S., & Yerou, C. (2016). Aligning ESP courses with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages. Language Learning in Higher Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2016-0015
Bahmanpour, K., Faramarzi, S. O., & Naghipour, R. (2010). Finiteness properties of local cohomology modules and generalized regular sequences. Journal of Algebra and Its Applications, 9(2), 315–325. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219498810003951
Charttrakul, K., & Damnet, A. (2021). Role of the CEFR and English Teaching in Thailand: A Case Study of Rajabhat Universities. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 12(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.12n.2.p.82
Foley, J. (2019). Issues on the initial impact of CEFR in Thailand and the region. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v9i2.20233
Jeon, J. H. (2022). A Systematic Review of CEFR-Related Research of English Education in South Korea. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 11(8), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v11n8p363
Kaowiwattanakul, S. (2021). CEFR Based Learning Approach: Using Literature to Enhance EFL Students’ Reading Skills and Critical Thinking Skills. English Language Teaching, 14(11), 66. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n11p66
Miqawati, A., Wijayanti, F., & Ismailia, T. (2023). Adopting CEFR for English Language Learning in Indonesia to support 21st Century Skills. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.5-11-2022.2326530
Nagai, N., & O’Dwyer, F. (2011). The actual and potential impacts of the CEFR on language education in Japan. Synergies Europe, 6, 141–152.
Nakatani, Y. (2012). Exploring the Implementation of the CEFR in Asian Contexts: Focus on Communication Strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 771–775. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.196
Practice, G. (2011). Using the CEFR. October. http://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/126011-using-cefr-principles-of-good-practice.pdf
Profile, S. E. E., & Profile, S. E. E. (2018). Action-Oriented Approach In Foreign Language Teaching Action-Oriented Approach In Foreign Language Teaching Murat DELİBAŞ * and Rıfat GÜNDAY. November 2016.
Rifiyanti, H. (2020). Learners’ Perceptions of Online English Learning during COVID-19 Pandemic. Scope : Journal of English Language Teaching, 5(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.30998/scope.v5i1.6719
Zaki, A. W., & Darmi, R. (2021). The implementation of CEFR in ESL Learning: Why does it matter to the Malaysian Education System. Asian Journal of Assessment in Teaching and Learning, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.37134/ajatel.vol11.2.1.2021
Published
2023-07-24
How to Cite
RIFIYANTI, Hafizah. IMPLEMENTING FRAMEWORK OF CEFR FOR TEACHING ENGLISH LANGUAGE IN NON-ENGLISH STUDY PROGRAM. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Proficiency, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 2, p. 76 - 88, july 2023. Available at: <https://ejournal.uniska-kediri.ac.id/index.php/PROFICIENCY/article/view/3386>. Date accessed: 22 jan. 2025. doi: https://doi.org/10.32503/proficiency.v5i2.3386.
Section
Articles