Audit Risk Assessment and Fair Financial Reporting: Evidence from Muscat Stock Exchange in Oman

Fahad Said Al-Hajri; Salim Amur Mohammed Al-Hajri

doi:10.32503/jck.v5i1.8525

Fahad Said Al-Hajri A'Sharqiyah University
Salim Amur Mohammed Al-Hajri A'Sharqiyah University

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32503/jck.v5i1.8525

Abstract

Introduction/Main Objectives: This study examines the link between audit risk assessment and the fairness of financial statements among companies listed on the Muscat Stock Exchange. It highlights auditors' perceptions of risk assessment covering inherent, control, and detection risks and underscores its importance for stakeholders and boards in supporting sound financial decisions and mitigating financial distress, losses, and bankruptcy, in line with international guidelines such as ISO 31000. Novelty: This study addresses the gap in audit risk assessment research within the Omani context. By applying advanced quantitative analysis, it demonstrates the importance of risk assessment in safeguarding firm assets and preventing bankruptcy or shutdown, while offering a foundation for future studies. Research Methods: This study employs a deductive quantitative approach using structured questionnaires distributed to external auditors and stockholders. Of 250 questionnaires, 162 valid responses were analyzed with SPSS to test the hypotheses. Finding/Results: Findings reveal a significant positive association between audit risk assessment and the fairness of financial statements, which strengthens stakeholder trust in Oman's financial reporting. Conclusion: This study confirms a significant positive relationship between audit risk assessment and the fairness of financial statements, reinforcing the reliability of external auditors' reports in Oman. Supported by regulatory frameworks and Oman's Vision 2040 emphasis on governance and transparency, the findings highlight the crucial role of auditors in enhancing stakeholder confidence in financial reporting.

References

Abdel-Jalil, E.-K. (2018). The impact of the audit risks on the quality of the external audit in the Algerian environment.

Al-Adawi, M. (2018). The impact of the Internal control System on the Efficiency of the Review with Statistical Samples. Al Neelain University, Sudan.

Al Matarneh, G. F. (2011). Factors Determining the Internal Audit Quality in Banks: Empirical Evidence from Jordan. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 73, 110–119.

Alssabagh, S. H. (2016). The Effect of Quantification Risks of Material Misstatements in Improving the Accuracy of Audit Risk Assessment: An Applied Study. In Unpublished PhD Dissertation of Accounting), Syria: Damascus University.

Arens, A. A., Elder, R. J., & Beaslsy, M. S. (2005). Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach, 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2005.

Bedard, J. C., & Graham, L. E. (2002). The Effects of Decision Aid Orientation on Risk Factor Identification and Audit Test Planning. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 21(2), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2002.21.2.39

Chang, S.-I., Tsai, C.-F., Shih, D.-H., & Hwang, C.-L. (2008). The development of audit detection risk assessment system: Using the fuzzy theory and audit risk model. Expert Systems with Applications, 35(3), 1053–1067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.08.057

De Martinis, M. (2005). The impact of the external auditor’s engagement risk assessments on audit resource allocation decisions. Thesis for: Doctor of Philosophy from ANU.

Dusenbury, R. B., Reimers, J. L., & Wheeler, S. W. (2000). The Audit Risk Model: An Empirical Test for Conditional Dependencies among Assessed Component Risks. AUDITING: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.2.105

IFAC. (2007). Information technology for professional accountants.

ISA. (315 C.E.). Identifying and Assessing the Risks of material misstatement through Understanding the Entity and Its Environment, paragraph 4 (b).

Kassem, R. (2014). Detecting asset misappropriation: a framework for external auditors. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 10(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJAAPE.2014.059181

Khurana, I. K., & Raman, K. K. (2004). Litigation Risk and the Financial Reporting Credibility of Big 4 versus Non-Big 4 Audits: Evidence from Anglo-American Countries. The Accounting Review, 79(2), 473–495. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.2.473

Monroe, G. S., Ng, J. K. L., & Woodliff, D. R. (1993). The importance of inherent risk factors: auditors ’perceptions. Australian Accounting Review, 3(6), 34–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1835-2561.1993.tb00370.x

Naghi, M. (2000). International standards for Auditing. (1st ed). Egypt: Modern library, (Chapter 6).
Tanasă, F.-E. (2018). Risk estimation and analysis in financial audit: method provided by the international standards on auditing. The Journal of Accounting and Management, 8(3), 27–36.

Tandon, B. N. (2020). A Handbook of Practical Auditing. S. Chand Publishing.

Zaqoot, N. (2016). The use of red flags indicators in improving the effectiveness of the audit for detection of financial fraud. Islamic University- Gaza, Philistine.