Each article submitted to the Journal Agribisnis Cendekia, editor will be checked on the suitability of the format and scope with the Journal of Journal Agribisnis Cendekia, then a peer review will be conducted with at least 2 reviewers in accordance with the scope of the scholarship/topic. The results of the review will be returned to the author and the author must make a revision. If the repair is enough to meet the rules to be loaded then the article will go into the next process, but if not yet the editor will return the article to the author for repairs again.

Type of peer review

Submitted manuscripts will generally be reviewed by two to three experts who will be asked to evaluate whether the manuscript is scientifically sound and coherent, whether it duplicates the already published works, and whether or not the manuscript is sufficiently clear for publication. The method is a double-blind review 

Review reports

Reviewers are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:

• Is original by stating the objectives and gap clearly
• Is methodologically sound
• Follows appropriate ethical guidelines
• Has results/findings which are clearly presented and support the conclusions
• Correctly references previous relevant work
• Reviewers are not expected to correct or copyedit manuscripts. Language correction is not part of the peer-review process. 

Review Process

The next author is required to respond to the review results from reviewers who have been sent and decided by the Editor. Editor's decisions are usually the result of Reviewer recommendations. In OJS, the decisions to be received by the Author are as follows:

1. Accept Submission, meaning that the Reviewer recommends that the script be accepted without any improvement.
2. Revision Required, meaning that reviewers recommend that the script needs minor repairs without having to review
3. Resubmit for Review, meaning that reviewers recommend scripts need to be reviewed again by reviewers. This is because too many revisions are needed
4. Decline Submission, meaning that the reviewer recommends the script be rejected. Usually related to the quality of the text. 

Decision

Reviewers advise the editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article. The Editors will reach a decision based on these reports and, where necessary, they will consult with members of the Editorial Board. Editor’s decision is final.