Juvenile Sentencing Policy in Cases of Unauthorized Possession of Sharp Weapons: A Study of North Jakarta District Court Judgment 2024–2025

Main Article Content

Ivanly Ivanly Raden Rara Hapsari Tunjung Sekartaji

Abstract

This research is motivated by the complexity of handling cases of unauthorized possession of sharp weapons by juveniles in conflict with the law. The normative conflict between the repressive Emergency Law No. 12 of 1951 and the restorative Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law has led to inconsistencies in court judgment and legal uncertainty. This study aims to analyze the current sentencing policy in addressing such criminal acts. The method used is normative juridical with a statutory approach and case approach (analysis of North Jakarta District Court judgment 2024–2025), as well as qualitative analysis of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results show disparities in case rulings and weak standard guidelines for imposing sanctions: some juveniles were sentenced to social institution rehabilitation or vocational training, while others were simply returned to their parents. This disparity creates legal uncertainty for juveniles as offenders, since similar cases are treated differently without clear criteria. In conclusion, the current sentencing policy has not consistently applied the principles of restorative justice and ultimum remedium, thus harmonization of legislation and clear guidelines are needed to ensure legal protection for children.

Article Details

How to Cite
IVANLY, Ivanly; TUNJUNG SEKARTAJI, Raden Rara Hapsari. Juvenile Sentencing Policy in Cases of Unauthorized Possession of Sharp Weapons: A Study of North Jakarta District Court Judgment 2024–2025. UNISKA LAW REVIEW, [S.l.], v. 6, n. 2, p. 167 - 192, july 2026. ISSN 2774-5252. Available at: <https://ejournal.uniska-kediri.ac.id/index.php/SJ/article/view/9048>. Date accessed: 12 july 2026. doi: https://doi.org/10.32503/ulr.v6i2.9048.
Section
Articles

References

1. Books
Barda Nawawi Arief. Tujuan Dan Pedoman Pemidanaan (Perspektif Pembaharuan & Perbandingan Hukum Pidana). 3rd ed. Semarang: Pustaka Magister, 2011.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana, 2017.
Dicey, Albert Venn. Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution. Macmillan, 1915.
Haryono. Hukum, Teori Dan Metode Penelitian Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia, 2005.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2005.
Muhaimin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020.
Nasihuddin, Abdul Aziz, et al. Teori Hukum Pancasila. 1st ed. CV. Elvaretta Buana, 2024.
Zed, Mestika. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2014.
Haq, Dimas Aljamili. “Dukungan Emosional Keluarga Dalam Proses Rehabilitasi Sosial Anak Berhadapan Hukum Di Sentra Handayani Jakarta.” Universitas Islam Negeri Jakarta, 2023. (Skripsi)
Pehulisa, Kalvin. “Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Anak Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Membawa Senjata Tajam Tanpa Hak (Studi Putusan No. 60/Pid.Sus-Anak/2023/PN Mdn).” Universitas Medan Area, 2024. (Skripsi)
Wijaya, Mahatma Mustika Purwa. “Pemenuhan Hak Pendidikan Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum (ABH) (Studi Kasus Lpka Ii Yogyakarta).” Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta, 2024. (Skripsi)
2. Journals
Ananda, Fiska. “Penerapan Diversi Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana.” Jurnal Daulat Hukum 1, no. 1 (March 15, 2018). https://doi.org/10.30659/JDH.V1I1.2566.
Ansori. “Criminal Justice System of Children in The Law Number 11 of 2012 (Restorative Justice).” Rechtsidee 1, no. 1 (2014): 1–130. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v1i1.95.
Anwar, Mashuril, and M. Ridho Wijaya. “Fungsionalisasi Dan Implikasi Asas Kepentingan Terbaik Bagi Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum: Studi Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tanjung Karang.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 2, no. 2 (2019): 268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.2.2.265-292.
Fithri, Beby Suryani. “Asas Ultimum Remedium Terhadap Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Dalam Rangka Perlindungan Anak.” Jurnal Mercatoria 10, no. 1 (2017): 74–88. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v10i1.733.
Hartawan, Agung. “Tafsir Hukum Klausul Tanpa Hak Dalam Pasal 2 Undang-Undang Darurat No. 12 Tahun 1951...” Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang 3, no. 1 (January 31, 2020): 42–60. https://doi.org/10.33474/YUR.V3I1.4861.
Heri, Ririn Nurfaathirany, et al. “Perampasan Kemerdekaan Dan Pembatasan Kebebasan Dalam Hukum.” Seminar Nasional LP2M UNM 0, no. 0 (December 1, 2023). https://doi.org/10.25041/FIATJUSTISIA.V7NO1.362.
Ibadata, Tekun. “Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Anak Yang Membawa Atau Menyimpan Senjata Tajam Di Wilayah Hukum Polresta Yogyakarta.” Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 11, no. 2 (2025): 158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46839/lljih.v11i2.493.
Indratiwi, Nila Audina, and Totok Minto Leksono. “Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Hak Dan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dalam Proses.” Dinamika Hukum & Masyarakat 5, no. 1 (June 6, 2023). https://doi.org/10.30737/dhm.v5i1.3865.
Mufidah, Lailatul, and Uswatul Khasanah. “Implikasi Diversi Dalam Membentuk Tanggungjawab Anak Menuju Keadilan Restoratif.” Jurnal Legislatif, 2019, 24–37. https://doi.org/10.20956/JL.V2I2.10217.
Novita Erdianti, Ratri, and Sholahuddin Al-Fatih. “Fostering as an Alternative Sanction for Juveniles in the Perspective of Child Protection in Indonesia.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 4, no. 1 (May 6, 2019): 119–28. https://doi.org/10.15294/JILS.V4I01.29315.
Patria, A. Ardianda, and Azhar. “Penerapan Undang-Undang Darurat No. 12 Tahun 1951 Terhadap Pelaku Pembawa Senjata Tajam.” Jurnal Hukum Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Program PascaSarjana Universitas Sriwijaya 1, no. 2 (2003): 29.
Riartono, Muhammad Riyamizar, and Fuad Nur. “Analisis Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Tanpa Korban Membawa Senjata Tajam Oleh Pelaku Anak Di Kota Kendari.” Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora 1, no. 3 (July 17, 2025): 680–690. https://doi.org/10.63822/3HERR679.
Sofyan, Irwan, and Kurniawati Gunardi. “Implementasi Pendidikan Formal Bagi Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Di Lembaga Pembinaan Khusus Anak Kelas II Bandung.” Jurnal Socius: Journal of Sociology Research and Education 7, no. 1 (June 12, 2020): 23. https://doi.org/10.24036/SCS.V7I1.173.
Wicaksono, Adi Hardiyanto, and Pujiyono Pujiyono. “Kebijakan Pelaksanaan Diversi Sebagai Perlindungan Bagi Anak Yang Berkonflik Dengan Hukum Pada Tingkat Penuntutan Di Kejaksaan Negeri Kudus.” LAW REFORM 11, no. 1 (March 31, 2015): 12–42. https://doi.org/10.14710/LR.V11I1.15752.
Witasari, Aryani, and Muhammad Sholikul Arif. “Implementasi Diversi Guna Mewujudkan Restorative Justice Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak” 35, no. 2 (2019).

3. Regulations
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Darurat Nomor 12 Tahun 1951 tentang Mengubah Ordonnantie Tijdelijke Bijzondere Strafbepalingen (Stbl. 1948 Nomor 17).
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.
Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Diversi dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Pidana Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.
Convention on the Rights of the Child (Konvensi Hak Anak), diratifikasi melalui Keputusan Presiden Nomor 36 Tahun 1990.

4. Website
Ananda. “Teori Kepastian Hukum Menurut Para Ahli,” n.d. https://www.gramedia.com/literasi/teori-kepastian-hukum/.
Anggoro, Kusnanto. “Keamanan, Pertahanan Negara, Dan Ketertiban Umum.” In Departemen Kehakiman Dan HAM RI. Bali, 2003. (Prosiding/Seminar). https://adoc.pub/keamanan-nasional-pertahanan-negara-dan-ketertiban-umum-oleh.html
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. “Data Perkara Di Pengadilan Negeri Pada Tahun 2022-2024,” n.d. https://badilum.mahkamahagung.go.id/attachments/article/4857/Infografis Anak Berhadapan Dengan Hukum.pdf.
Tim Hukumonline. “Perlindungan HAM Dalam Pasal 28A Sampai 28J UUD 1945.” Hukumonline, n.d. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/pasal-28a-sampai-28j-uud-1945-lt642a9cb7df172/?page=2.
Willa Wahyuni. “Mengenal Restorative Justice.” Tim Hukum Online, June 20, 2022. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mengenal-restorative-justice-lt62b063989c193/?page=all