Recognition of Customary Law in The Perspective of Indonesian Criminal Law
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the recognition of customary law in the perspective of Indonesian criminal law as a response to the pluralistic character of society and the dynamics of National Legal Reform. Since colonial times, customary law has been understood as living law, that is, norms that are alive and have social binding power even though they are not codified. In recent developments, the recognition of the law that lives in society gained legitimacy in the new criminal code, but still caused tension with the principle of legality through the principle of nullum crimen sine lege. The research method used is normative legal research with legislation and conceptual approach. As a result of the discussion, the existence of customary law in Indonesian criminal law offers restorative potential and socio-cultural values that enrich the criminal system, especially through the rapprochement of perpetrators, victims, and the community. However, unwritten customary norms pose challenges to legal certainty, principles of legality, and Human Rights. The integration of customary law into the new penal code allowed for a restorative approach that was responsive to local needs, particularly minor crimes. In order to remain in line with the principles of the modern rule of law, integration must be carried out in a measurable manner through clear regulation, institutional supervision, normative harmonization, and multidisciplinary involvement, thus preventing inconsistency, discrimination, or legal irregularities.
Keywords: customary law, principle of legality, Restorative Justice..
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Feuerbach, Anselm von. 1801. Lehrbuch des gemeinen in Deutschland geltenden peinlichen Rechts.
Hadjon, Philipus M. dan Tatiek Sri Djatmiati. 2005. Argumentasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. 2016. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana.
Moeljatno. 1983. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
Pound, Roscoe. 1922. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. 1985. Hukum Progresif. Bandung: Alumni.
———. 1985. Hukum Progresif: Ruang Lingkup, Metode, dan Cetusan Pemikiran. Bandung: Alumni.
Soekanto, Soerjono dan Sri Mamudji. 2001. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada.
Soepomo. 1960. Pokok-Pokok Filsafat Hukum Indonesia. Jakarta: Penerbit FH UI.
Sudarto. 1990. Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta: Alumni.
Vollenhoven, Cornelis van. 1925. Het Adatrecht van Nederlandsch-Indië. Leiden: E.J. Brill.
Zehr, Howard. 2005. Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice. Scottsdale, PA: Herald Press.
B. Journal
Christie, Nils. 1977. “Conflict as Property.” British Journal of Criminology.
Farahwati. 2014. “Hakekat Hukum Pidana Terhadap Perbuatan Melawan Hukum di Masyarakat.” Dedikasi. 30(1).
Hasibuan, Edi Saputra, Andri, dan Marlina Samosir. 2026. “Rekonstruksi Pengakuan Living Law dalam KUHP Baru dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum Pidana di Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Ilmu. 3(1).
Mulyadi, Lilik. 2013. “Eksistensi Hukum Pidana Adat di Indonesia: Pengkajian Asas, Norma, Teori dan Prosedurnya.” Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan. 2(2).
Sosiawan, Ulang Mangun. 2016. “Perspektif Restorative Justice sebagai Wujud Perlindungan Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure. 16(4).
Suhariyono AR. 2009. “Penentuan Sanksi Pidana Dalam Suatu Undang-Undang.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia. 6(4).
Tene, D. R., A. Muliyono, dan N. Lahangatubun. 2023. “Implikasi Penerapan Hukum Pidana Adat dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pasca Pembaruan Hukum Pidana Nasional Indonesia.” EKSPOSE: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum dan Pendidikan. 22(2).
Widiasa, I Made. 2022. “Peran Hakim dalam Penegakan Restoratif Justice Melalui Hukum Pidana Adat.” Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH). 8(2).
Yogaswara, Yanuardi, Tata Surwita, dan Dewi Asri Yustia. 2024. “Implikasi Penerapan Hukum Pidana Adat dalam Pasal 2 KUHP terhadap Asas Legalitas dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” El-Mujtama: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat. 4(3).