Ambiguity of Interpretation in The Criminal Act of Contempt of State Institutions in The Potential Criminal Acts of Abuse of Power
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study examines the ambiguity of interpretation in the criminal act of contempt of state institutions in the context of potential criminal acts of abuse of power. The method used is legal research. The results show that democracy requires the guarantee of freedom of expression as a basis for public participation and a mechanism for controlling power. In this context, the criminal act of insulting state institutions becomes problematic when formulated in a multi-interpretive manner and does not comply with the principles of legality and lex certa. The ambiguity of the element of "insult" opens up wide discretion for law enforcement officials and has the potential to lead to selective law enforcement. Philosophically, state institutions as public entities cannot be equated with individuals in terms of protecting moral honor, because these institutions are formed to carry out public functions that must be open to criticism. In the new Criminal Code, the criminal threat of insulting state institutions is posed between the goal of protecting the institution and the potential for repression. The state does have an interest in maintaining the authority and function of its institutions, but disproportionate penalties risk exceeding the limits of a last resort. If applied broadly and elastically, this provision can have a chilling effect, limit the space for criticism, and open up opportunities for abuse of power.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Ancel, Marc. Social Defence: A Modern Approach to Criminal Problems. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1965.
Arief, Barda Nawawi. Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana, 2010.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Hukum Tata Negara dan Pilar-Pilar Demokrasi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2011.
Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.
Budiardjo, Miriam. Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2008.
Dahl, Robert A. On Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1998.
Dworkin, Ronald. Freedom’s Law: The Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Fuller, Lon L. The Morality of Law. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1964.
Hadjon, Philipus M., dan Tatiek Sri Djatmiati. Argumentasi Hukum. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 2005.
Hamzah, Andi. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana di Indonesia dan Perkembangannya. Jakarta: Softmedia, 2010.
Kant, Immanuel. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Trans. Mary Gregor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2016.
Meiklejohn, Alexander. Political Freedom. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1960.
Montesquieu. The Spirit of the Laws. Terj. Anne M. Cohler. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Moeljatno. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2008.
Packer, Herbert L. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1968.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. Hukum Progresif: Hukum yang Membebaskan. Jakarta: Kompas, 2009.
Remmelink, Jan. Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama, 2003.
Soekanto, Soerjono, dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2001.
Sudarto. Hukum Pidana I. Semarang: Yayasan Sudarto, 1990.
Tamanaha, Brian Z. On the Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Waldron, Jeremy. The Harm in Hate Speech. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2012.
United Nations. Siracusa Principles on the Limitation and Derogation Provisions in the ICCPR. 1984.
2. Journals
Agustina, R. A., Madjid, A., & Noedajasakti, S. (2023). Freedom of expression in regulating criminal acts of defamation against the government and state institutions. Path of Science, 9(8), Section “Law and Security”, 1008.
Koriahningsih, A. (2024). Problematika politik hukum penerapan kriminalisasi dalam KUHP baru. Jurnal Hukum Legalita, 6(2), 205–217.
Radbruch, Gustav. (2006). Statutory lawlessness and supra-statutory law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 26, 1–11.
Rahmasari, N. S. N., & Soeskandi, H. (2022). Penghidupan kembali pasal penghinaan presiden dan wakil presiden. Mimbar Keadilan, 15(1), 27–49.
Ritonga, Z., Syam, S. A., & Lubis, F. (2024). Kebijakan kriminalisasi dan dekriminalisasi KUHP baru. Innovative: Journal of Social Science Research, 4(4), 3957–3967.
Saputro, L. A., & Anwar, A. S. (2023). Menyoal pasal penghinaan presiden dalam KUHP. WICARANA, 2(1), 14–26.
Sari, R. M., Ridlwan, Z., & Natamiharja, R. (2025). Pelembagaan delik penghinaan terhadap pemerintah dalam KUHP baru. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 2(3), 1–9.
Schauer, Frederick. (1978). Fear, risk and the First Amendment. Boston University Law Review, 58, 685–732.
Wiwin, Pradana, S. A., & Haq, M. I. D. (2023). The regulation of articles on state institutional insults. Mulawarman Law Review, 8(1), 21.
Yanis, T. Z. A., Muhtadi, Saleh, A., & Yanis, A. M. (2025). The unconstitutionality of the offence of insulting the government in the 2023 Criminal Code. As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law, 5(1), 26.