POLITIK DINASTI DI INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM DAN DEMOKRASI
Abstract
Fenomena politik dinasti di Indonesia telah menjadi isu yang kerap memicu perdebatan publik, terutama dalam pelaksanaan demokrasi dan supremasi hukum. Politik dinasti mengacu pada keterlibatan anggota keluarga atau kerabat dekat pejabat publik dalam kontestasi politik, yang kerap diasosiasikan dengan praktik nepotisme dan penyalahgunaan kekuasaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji praktik politik dinasti di Indonesia dari perspektif hukum dan demokrasi, serta menganalisis implikasinya terhadap sistem ketatanegaraan. Metode yang digunakan adalah kualitatif deskriptif dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui studi pustaka, observasi, dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa politik dinasti belum diatur secara tegas dalam peraturan perundang-undangan, sehingga membuka ruang terjadinya penyalahgunaan kekuasaan dan ketimpangan akses dalam politik elektoral. Hal ini berpotensi melemahkan prinsip meritokrasi, keadilan, dan akuntabilitas publik, serta menurunkan kepercayaan masyarakat terhadap institusi demokrasi dan penegakan hukum. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan regulasi dan sistem pengawasan yang lebih efektif untuk menjaga kualitas demokrasi dan menegakkan prinsip negara hukum di Indonesia.
References
Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2016). Electoral Dynamics in Indonesia: Money Politics, Patronage and Clientelism at the Grassroots. Singapore: NUS Press.
Hadiz, Vedi R. (2010). Localising Power in Post-Authoritarian Indonesia: A Southeast Asia Perspective.
Robison, Richard & Vedi R. Hadiz. (2004). Reorganising Power in Indonesia: The Politics of Oligarchy in an Age of Markets.
Smith, D. M. (2018). Dynasties and Democracy: The Inherited Incumbency Advantage in Japan. Stanford University Press.
JURNAL:
Ananda, A. I. (2023). The Influence Of Political Dynasty On The Democracy Climate: Pengaruh Dinasti Politik Terhadap Iklim Demokrasi. Constitutional Law Society, 2(1), 9–17. Https://Doi.Org/10.36448/Cls.V2i2.37
Bhagwati, J. N. (1992). Democracy And Development. Journal Of Democracy, 3(3), 37–44. Https://Doi.Org/10.1353/Jod.1992.0030
Budi, A. (2020a). Less Democracy, More Centralism: The Selection Of Candidates By Golkar And Pdip In Indonesian Subnational Executive Elections, 2005–2020. Asian Journal Of Political Science, 28(3), 236–255. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/02185377.2020.1774909
Budi, A. (2020b). Less Democracy, More Centralism: The Selection Of Candidates By Golkar And Pdip In Indonesian Subnational Executive Elections, 2005–2020. Asian Journal Of Political Science, 28(3), 236–255. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/02185377.2020.1774909
Carlson, M. (2020a). Dynasties And Democracy: The Inherited Incumbency Advantage In Japan. By Daniel M. Smith. Stanford, Ca: Stanford University Press, 2018. 384p. $65.00 Cloth. Perspectives On Politics, 18(1), 307–308. Https://Doi.Org/10.1017/S1537592719004171
Carlson, M. (2020b). Dynasties And Democracy: The Inherited Incumbency Advantage In Japan. By Daniel M. Smith. Stanford, Ca: Stanford University Press, 2018. 384p. $65.00 Cloth. Perspectives On Politics, 18(1), 307–308. Https://Doi.Org/10.1017/S1537592719004171
Dalton, R. J. (1985). Political Parties And Political Representation: Party Supporters And Party Elites In Nine Nations. Comparative Political Studies, 18(3), 267–299. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0010414085018003001
Dean, R., Gagnon, J.-P., & Asenbaum, H. (2019). What Is Democratic Theory? Democratic Theory, 6(2), V–Xx. Https://Doi.Org/10.3167/Dt.2019.060201
Documents On Democracy. (2024). Journal Of Democracy, 35(1), 167–175. Https://Doi.Org/10.1353/Jod.2024.A915357
Fiva, J. H., & Smith, D. M. (2018). Political Dynasties And The Incumbency Advantage In Party-Centered Environments. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 706–712. Https://Doi.Org/10.1017/S0003055418000047
Kann, R. A. (1973). Dynastic Relations And European Power Politics (1848-1918). The Journal Of Modern History, 45(3), 387–410. Https://Doi.Org/10.1086/241021
Khalib Gadafi & Sasmi Nelwati. (2024). Dampak Dinasti Politik Terhadap Culture Demokrasi Pancasila Di Indonesia. Journal Innovation In Education, 2(3), 133–148. Https://Doi.Org/10.59841/Inoved.V2i3.1384
Mendoza, R. U., Beja, E. L., Venida, V. S., & Yap, D. B. (2016). Political Dynasties And Poverty: Measurement And Evidence Of Linkages In The Philippines. Oxford Development Studies, 44(2), 189–201. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/13600818.2016.1169264
Mukti, H. H., & Rodiyah, R. (2020). Dynasty Politics In Indonesia: Tradition Or Democracy? Journal Of Law And Legal Reform, 1(3), 531–538. Https://Doi.Org/10.15294/Jllr.V1i3.38090
Novilia, K., Purnama, A., Wardhani, A. C., & Trenggono, N. (2024). Jokowi’s Political Dynasties: Impact And Its Comparison To Nehru-Gandhi Dynasties. Journal Of Islamic World And Politics, 7(2), 235–244. Https://Doi.Org/10.18196/Jiwp.V7i2.76
Parker, W. C. (1997). Democracy And Difference. Theory & Research In Social Education, 25(2), 220–234. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/00933104.1997.10505805
Przeworski, A. (2024). Who Decides What Is Democratic? Journal Of Democracy, 35(3), 5–16. Https://Doi.Org/10.1353/Jod.2024.A930423
Purdey, J., & Mietzner, M. (2016). The Sukarno Dynasty In Indonesia: Between Institutionalisation, Ideological Continuity And Crises Of Succession. South East Asia Research, 24(3), 355–368. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/0967828x16659028
Schwartz, T. (2021). Parties. Constitutional Political Economy, 32(4), 462–475. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S10602-021-09326-W
Setyawibawa, R. A., Harahap, R. H., Amin, M., & Achmad, N. (2024a). Family Rivalry And Its Impact On Local Democracy: An Analysis Of Political Dynasties In Samosir Regency, Indonesia. Research Journal In Advanced Humanities, 5(4). Https://Doi.Org/10.58256/Rfcv2516
Setyawibawa, R. A., Harahap, R. H., Amin, M., & Achmad, N. (2024b). Family Rivalry And Its Impact On Local Democracy: An Analysis Of Political Dynasties In Samosir Regency, Indonesia. Research Journal In Advanced Humanities, 5(4). Https://Doi.Org/10.58256/Rfcv2516
Thananithichot, S., & Satidporn, W. (2016). Political Dynasties In Thailand: The Recent Picture After The 2011 General Election. Asian Studies Review, 40(3), 340–359. Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/10357823.2016.1193473
Universitas Islam Syekh-Yusuf, Tangerang, Indonesia., & Ferry Bastian, A. (2024). Resilience And Persistence Of Political Dynasties: The Case Of The Chasan Sochib Family In Banten, Indonesia. International Journal Of Advanced Research, 12(11), 1082–1087. Https://Doi.Org/10.21474/Ijar01/19922.
UNDANG-UNDANG:
Undang-Undang Dasar 1945
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum.
UU No. 10 Tahun 2016 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas UU No. 1 Tahun 2015 tentang Penetapan Perppu No. 1 Tahun 2014 tentang Pilkada menjadi UU.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 2011 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2008 tentang Partai Politik. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2011 Nomor 8
Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 1999 tentang Penyelenggaraan Negara yang Bersih dan Bebas dari KKN
Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi (2015, No. 33/PUU-XIII/2015)


