KEWENANGAN PENUNTUT UMUM ANAK UNTUK MELAKUKAN PENUNTUTAN TERHADAP ANAK PELANGGAR HUKUM DALAM UPAYA DIVERSI YANG GAGAL (Studi kasus di Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Kediri)
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to analyze the authority of the Child Public Prosecutor to prosecute children who break the law in a failed diversion attemp and to analyze the cause of the failure of the Child Prosecutor in seeking diversion for children as perpetrators of law violations.This study using empiris method with interviews and direct observation. Data collection techniques using primary data (structured interviews) and secondary data (observation and documentation). Sample collection techniques using purposive sampling method with 9 respondents are Child Public Prosecutor are 7 people and children who break the law are 2 people. The result of this study is The authority of the Child Public Prosecutor to prosecute children who break the law in failed diversion efforts is regulated in Law number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System (SPPA), namely: The Child Public Prosecutor has the authority to prosecute; The Child Prosecutor has the authority to carry out the decisions of judges and court decisions that have permanent legal force; The Child Prosecutor has the authority to supervise the implementation of Conditional Criminal Decisions, Supervision Criminal Decisions and Conditional Release Decisions; The Child Prosecutor has the authority to complete certain case files and for this reason can carry out additional examinations before being transferred to the Court, which is coordinated with the Investigator. The cause of the failure of the Child Prosecutors in pursuing diversion for children as perpetrators of law violations is the public's lack of understanding about diversion and the purpose of carrying out diversion; The victim does not want to forgive the actions of the perpetrator's child; There is no agreement between the victim and the perpetrator's child regarding the nominal value of the amount of loss that must be returned; The perpetrator's child has been punished before (recidivist).
References
D.S Dewi, Fatahillah A. Syukur, Mediasi penal : penerapan restorative justice di pengadilan anak Indonesia. (Depok: Indie Pub, 2011).
Khotibul Umam, Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Yustisia, 2010). Hlm 10.
Made Sepud, Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum melalui diversi dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak. (Surabaya: R.A.De.Rozarie, 2013). Hlm 36.
Maidin Gultom. Perlindungan hukum terhadap anak : dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak di Indonesia. (Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2010).
Marliana, Peradilan Pidana Anak di Indonesia (Pengembangan Konsep Diversi dan Restrorative Justice), Refika Aditama, Bandung : 2009, hlm.42.
Moh. Mahfud MD, Hukum Tak Kunjung Tegak (Jakarta: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2007) Hlm 97-98.
Muhammad Joni Zulchaina Z. Tanamas. Pengantar advokasi dan hukum perlindungan anak. (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1999).
Rachmayanthy,”Poltekip”, Litmas Pengadilan Anak Berkaitan Dengan Proses Penyidikan, (2010).
R. Wirjono Prodjodikoro, Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum dipandang dari sudut Hukum Perdata (Bandung: Vorkink-Van Hoeve, 1977) Hlm 41.
Simanjuntak. Latar Belakang Kenakalan Remaja. (Bandung: Alumni Bandung, 1979). Hlm 60.
Theo Lamintang, Hukum penitensier Indonesia (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010) Hlm 53.
Wadong Maulana Hassan. Pengantar advokasi dan hukum perlindungan anak. (Jakarta: Grasindo, 2000).
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Surat Perintah Kepala Kejaksaan Negeri Nganjuk No.Print- /05.29/Euh.2/07/2019. Surat Perintah Kepala Kejaksaan Negeri Kota Kediri (P-16) No.Print-02/M.5.13/Eku.1.a/05/2022.
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 Pasal 28 B ayat (2).
Undang-undang Republik Indonesia nomor 11 tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (SPPA).
Jurnal
Rachmayanthy,”Poltekip”, Litmas Pengadilan Anak Berkaitan Dengan Proses Penyidikan, (2010).
Tesis
Nurul Fransisca Damayanti, “The Authority of Children Public Prosecutor to do the prosecution to the children in the failed diversion effort in Jogjakarta” (Atmajaya Yogyakarta University, 2021).
Rida, “Applying the Concept of Diversity to Children who are Facing Legal Case” (State Islamic Institute of Palopo, 2020).
Internet
http://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id, “Kajian konsep keadilan dalam Pancasila sebagai dasar negara hukum Indonesia,” Akses 12 Oktober 2022.
http://repository.usu.ac.id, “Penerapan konsep Diversi terhadap anak pelaku tindak pidana dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak,” Akses 12 Oktober 2022.
http://eprints.undip.ac.id, “Peradilan Restoratif: Model Peradilan Anak Indonesia Masa Datang”, Akses 12 Oktober 2022.
http://lushiana.staff.uns.ac.id, “Keadilan restoratif bagi anak yang berhadapan dengan hukum”, Akses 12 Oktober 2022.
https://www.dpr.go.id, “Perubahan atas Undang - Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 2 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Umum”, Akses 19 Oktober 2022.
