EFEKTIVITAS PROGRAM PERHUTANAN SOSIAL DAN REFORMA AGRARIA DI KAWASAN HUTAN KABUPATEN BLITAR

Mohammad Trijanto; Nurbaedah Nurbaedah

doi:10.32503/mizan.v13i2.6585

Mohammad Trijanto Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Kadiri
Nurbaedah Nurbaedah Magister Ilmu Hukum, Pascasarjana Universitas Islam Kadiri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32503/mizan.v13i2.6585

Abstract

The Social Forestry Program in Blitar Regency has not been running in accordance with its utilization and management rights. The response from KPH Perum Perhutani and the Blitar Regency Government was still very low regarding issues of social forestry and Agrarian Reform, so that the two programs that were formed for the community were still not running effectively. The purpose of this study is the effectiveness and obstacles of the Social Forestry and Agrarian Reform programs in the Blitar Regency Forest Area. This study uses an empirical approach. Data collection technique used is interview. The results of the research show that: 1) With the existence of the social forestry program, the community gets legal protection, so that if other parties want to take over or take over, they have legal power over the land they are working on. For the people who have undergone this program, they are greatly helped by the existence of the social forestry program; 2) Agrarian reform is very appropriate for residents in forest areas. This is specifically for people who have lived there since the Dutch era, their ancestors also came from there. Their house has long been built in the neighborhood. So that the Agrarian Reform program really helps the community; 3) All problems and obstacles in the implementation of the Social Forestry and Agrarian Reform programs can be resolved quickly. This obstacle was caused by several parties missing information related to the Social Forestry program. All this time the forest was managed by Perum Perhutani but now it turns out that the community has been given management rights by forming a KTH (Forest Farmers Group), then submitting an application for a utilization permit to the Ministry of Environment and Forestry. What underlies many of the proposals so far is because farmers want to be the main subjects in forest management, besides that there are also reasons that while working on forestry land they often experience pressure and intimidation from the foreman and even the paramedics of Perum Perhutani.

References

Bernhard Limbong. (2012). Konflik Pertanahan. Margaretha Pustaka.
Boedi Harsono. (2008). Hukum Agraria : Sejarah h Pembentukan Undang - Undang, Isi dan Pelaksanaannya. Djambatan.
Henri Manik. (2022). Faktor - Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Efektivitas Implementasi Kebijakan Penyelesaian Penguasaan Tanah dalam Kawasan Hutan. Jurnal Widyaiswara Indonesia, 3(4), 177–188.
Luthfi, A. N. (2018). Reforma kelembagaan dalam kebijakan reforma agraria era Joko Widodo-Jusuf Kalla (Institutional reform for agrarian reform policy in the era of Joko Widodo-Jusuf Kalla reign)’. Bhumi: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan, 4(2), 140–163.
M. Nazir Salim, Sukmo Pinuji, & Westi Utami. (2018). Reforma Agraria di Kawasan Hutan Sungaitohor, Riau: Pengelolaan Perhutanan Sosial di Wilayah Perbatasan. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria Dan Pertanahan., 4(2), 164–189.
Moh. Andika Lawasi. (2022). Mengkonstruksi Akses, Pendampingan dan Inovasi Sebagai Formula Kebijakan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat dalam Program Perhutanan Sosial. JIANA: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 20(3), 50–65.
Muhammad Ilham Arisaputra. (2015). Reforma Agraria di Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Nairobi Y. Sri Susilo. (2019). Dampak Program Perhutanan Sosial terhadap Pendapatan masyarakat. Jurnal ISEI Economic Review, 3(1).
Randi Firman Syah, & Murdianto. (2021). Hubungan Tingkat Konflik Agraria Dengn Tingkat Efektivitas Program Model Kampung Konservasi (Desa Cipeuteuy, Kecamatan Kebandungan, Kabupaten Sukabumi, Provinsi Jawa Barat). Jurnal Sains Komunikasi Dan Pengembangan Masyarakat , 05(02), 345–259.
Sasongko. (2016). Perencanaan dan Strategi Pembangunan Bidang Kehutanan dan Konservasi Sumber Daya Air. Bappenas.
Suharjito, & Saputro. (2017). Modal Sosial dalam Pengelolaan Sumberdaya Hutan pada Masyarakat Kasepuhan, Banten Kidul. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 5(4), 317–335.
Supriatna, T. (2020). Strategi Pembangunan dan Kemiskinan. Rineka Cipta.
Tiara Nur Khanifa, Syarli Syanurisma, & Ahmad Nashih Lutfi. (2021). Menuju Reforma Agraria dan Perhutanan Sosial di Banyuwangi, Jawa Timur (Sebuah Telaah Spasial dan Tematik). Jurnal Widya Bhumi, 1(2), 101–124.
Waluyo, B. (2008). Pokok - Pokok Hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Yunan Firdaus Asep. (2018). Panduan Praktis Penerapan Kebijakan Perhutanan Sosial. CIFOR.