The Relativism in Language Study: Face Threatening Acts and Politeness Found in Kediri

Mohammad Muhyidin

doi:10.32503/edulink.v4i2.2802

Mohammad Muhyidin IAIN KEDIRI

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32503/edulink.v4i2.2802

Abstract

The rising or decreasing level of politeness impacts the intensity of human behavior. By using the theory of Brown and Levinson's model of politeness and civility theoretical model of Robin Lakoff, this paper aims to describe the Face Threatening Acts performed in public notices in Kediri. This study used the qualitative method because it focuses more on the analysis of written data rather than numbers. This study looks into public notices written by people in public places. The writer uses the theory of Relativism and politeness. The findings show that using more power, being forced, and playing with an adversary can create discomfort. An example can be seen from the public notice â€œAngel Ngeyel â€œJOTOSâ€ (English translation: Those who are disobedient will get punched). People who read this notice will feel uncomfortable and it may potentially influence the readers to think and act rudely. It affects people's behavior. Another notice reads â€œMlebu kene SETOR NYOWOâ€, which is about â€œZona Rawan Pukulâ€. This means that people must not enter the village because of the pandemic Covid 19. If they insist to enter the village, they will die or lose their lives. Based on the theory of Robin Lakoff, the notice tends to have declined politeness. This phenomenon is a result of unbridled democracy so everyone feels entitled to talk about anything, the higher frequencies that do not use polite language in the mass media and electronic, and depletion of mutual respect between people. As a result, the behavior of this nation into insolent, and destructive, and the hostility between people are increasingly visible and tend to be light publicly.

References

Ary, Donald. (2006). Introduction to Research in Education. Canada: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.

Brown., Steven C. Levinson. (1992). Politeness. Some Universals in Language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cook, Guy. (1994). Discourse and Literature. New York: Oxford University Press.

Cummings., Louis. (2005). Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Ellen., Gino. (2001). A Critique of Politeness Theories. Manchester: St. Jerome Publishing.

Grundy, Peter. (2000). Doing Your Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Holmes., Janet. (2001). Introduction to Sociolinguistics. London: Longman.

Jayanti., Ayyu Tri. (2013). Politeness Strategy Performed by Male and Female Facebook Users. (Published Undergraduate Thesis). Tulungagung: IAIN Tulungagung Press

Kinneavy., James, L. (1980). A Theory of Discourse. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

Leech., Geoffrey, N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Mills., Sara. (2003). Gender and Politeness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levinson, S.C. (1987). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maulidiyah, S. (2016). Face Threatening Acts and Politeness Strategy Performed by Debaters at Debate.Org Website. (Undergraduate Thesis. Published). Tulungagung: IAIN Tulungagung Press.

Sampson, Geoffrey. (1980). Schools of Linguistics. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Sidnell, J., & Enfield, N. J. (2012). Language diversity and social action: A third locus of linguistic relativity. Current Anthropology, 53(3), 302-333.

Smith., Larry E. (Ed.). (1987). Discourse Across Culture. New York: Prentice Hall.

Thomas., Jenny. (1997). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Yule, George. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: O.U.P