Public Ethic

Public Ethics

The publication of articles in the E D U L I N K: Education And Linguistics Knowledge Journal is an important component in the development of a coherent and respected knowledge network. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the writers and institutions that support them. Articles are supported by co-workers and contain scientific methods. Therefore, it is important to approve the expected public ethical standards for all parties involved in publishing, be it writers, editors, reviewers, publishers, and the public. As a publisher, the Journal Editorial Board takes over the trust of all stages of publishing that are serious and recognize ethical and other responsibilities. The decision of the Editorial Board of the Publication Journal is responsible for deciding which articles are submitted to the journal to be published. The editor can be guided by Editorial Policy and is limited by current legal requirements related to defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor can negotiate with other editors or other reviewers in making publication decisions. The Editorial Board evaluates scripts at any time for their intellectual content regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy of the author. Privacy The Editorial Board may not disclose any information about the text sent to anyone other than the author, reviewer, potential reviewers, other appropriate editorial advisors, and publishers, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

All authors must disclose in their text any other substantive conflicts that can be interpreted to influence the results or interpretation of their texts. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed. Fundamental errors in published work When an author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his published work, it is the author's duty to immediately notify the publisher's journal or editor and work with the editor to pull back or correct the paper.

Standard Reporting

The author of the original research report must present an accurate report on the work carried out and an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be accurately represented and the article must contain sufficient details and references to allow others to replicate the work. Declarations that are fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate are unethical and unacceptable behavior.

Data Access and Storage

If applicable, the author is required to provide raw data in connection with the article for an editorial review and must be prepared to provide public access to data and in any case, must be prepared to maintain data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors must ensure that they have a fully original work, and if the author has used the work and/or words of others, that this has been quoted or quoted appropriately.

Double, Exaggerated, or Similar Publications

An author should not generally publish a script that basically describes the same research in more than one journal or major publication. Sending the same script to more than one journal simultaneously is an unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

Source Recognition

Appropriate recognition of the work of others must always be given. The author must quote publications that have an influence in determining the nature of the work reported.

Basic Errors in Published Work

When an author finds significant errors or inaccuracies in his published work, it is the author's duty to immediately notify the journal or publisher of the editor and work with the editor to pull back or correct the paper.